Peer Review Record

Manuscript ID: JOSTA-202606-B415

Article Title: Assessment of Plastic Pollution and its Impact on Coastal Environment and Marine Biodiversity in the Thoothoor Coastal Region, Tamil Nadu, India

Double-anonymous review Accepted

Review Summary

ItemDetails
Submission Date19 June 2026
Editorial ScreeningCompleted
External Reviewers2
Review Rounds1
Revision TypeMinor Revision
Final DecisionAccepted
Acceptance Date11 August 2026

Editorial Assessment

The manuscript presents a field-based assessment of plastic pollution and its impact on the coastal environment and marine biodiversity along the Thoothoor coastal region of Tamil Nadu, India. The study was judged relevant and within the scope of JOSTA. Reviewers raised substantive concerns regarding the justification for site selection, the novelty of the study relative to existing plastic pollution literature on the Indian coast, the adequacy of a single year of seasonal sampling, the representativeness of the quadrat-based survey design, the strength of biodiversity-impact claims drawn from a single turtle-entanglement observation, the evidentiary basis for statements on microplastic transfer to humans, the omission of environmental covariates such as wave energy and sediment grain size, and quality-control measures to avoid double-counting plastic items across repeated seasonal surveys. Reviewers also requested clearer reporting of seasonal results, separate analysis of beach and rock-revetment habitats, disclosure of the calculation method behind Table 1, and removal of citations from the Results section. The authors satisfactorily addressed all comments, after which the manuscript was accepted for publication.

Review Timeline

Submission Received

19 June 2026

Manuscript submitted through the JOSTA submission portal.

Editorial Screening Completed

23 June 2026

Manuscript passed preliminary editorial checks.

Peer Review Initiated

30 June 2026

Two independent reviewers accepted the review assignment.

Reviewer Reports Received

10 July 2026

Reviewers recommended publication following minor revision.

Revised Manuscript Received

28 July 2026

Authors submitted a revised version addressing reviewer concerns.

Final Decision

11 August 2026

Accepted for publication.

Published Online

12 August 2026

Article published in Volume 2, Issue 3.

Key Issues Addressed During Revision

Reviewer concerns are summarised by category. Specific comments and author responses are confidential.

CategoryNature of ConcernStatus
Study Site Justification Rationale for selecting the Thoothoor coastal region as the study area to be clearly stated ✓ Addressed
Novelty & Contribution Distinction of this study from previous plastic pollution research conducted along the Indian coast to be more explicitly articulated ✓ Addressed
Sampling Design – Temporal Coverage Justification requested for considering one year of seasonal sampling sufficient for the study's conclusions ✓ Addressed
Sampling Design – Spatial Representativeness Explanation requested on how the quadrat placement ensured representative coverage of the entire beach ✓ Addressed
Results Interpretation Explanation requested for why Vallavilai emerged as the most polluted site ✓ Addressed
Strength of Biodiversity Claims Concern that a single Olive Ridley turtle entanglement observation may not be sufficient to support broader conclusions about biodiversity impacts ✓ Addressed
Evidentiary Basis for Claims Statements regarding microplastic transfer to humans identified as speculative and requiring direct supporting evidence or appropriate qualification ✓ Addressed
Data Visualisation Suggestion to include a spatial hotspot map to improve interpretation of pollution distribution ✓ Addressed
Methodological Scope Omission of environmental variables (wave energy, currents, beach slope, sediment grain size) from the analysis to be justified or addressed ✓ Addressed
Sampling Quality Control Clarification requested on measures taken to avoid double-counting the same plastic items across repeated seasonal surveys ✓ Addressed
Seasonal & Habitat Reporting Seasonal field survey (May 2025–May 2026) described but seasonal results not presented; beach and rock-revetment observations to be analysed and reported separately as distinct habitats ✓ Addressed
Quantitative Reporting (Table 1) Calculation method for Mean Plastic Wastage (kg) and percentage contribution to be included in Materials and Methods, with clarification on how the reported total (365 kg) relates to the number of transects (160) ✓ Addressed
Manuscript Structure Citations to be removed from the Results section, in keeping with the presence of a dedicated Discussion section ✓ Addressed

Peer Review Statement

Journal of Sustainable Technology in Agriculture (JOSTA) employs a double-anonymous peer review process. The identities of authors and reviewers remain mutually confidential throughout the review and publication process. Reviewer reports and correspondence are not published.

Voluntary reviewer disclosure. JOSTA respects reviewers' autonomy regarding attribution. A reviewer who wishes to be identified in the published article may notify the editorial office at any point before final acceptance. Upon written consent, the reviewer's name and affiliation will be acknowledged in the Publication & Reviewer Details section of the article. Reviewers who do not provide consent remain anonymous and are listed as Anonymous. This policy is strictly voluntary; no reviewer is under any obligation to disclose their identity.

This page provides a transparent summary of the editorial and peer-review process in accordance with JOSTA's open-science commitments. It does not constitute a full disclosure of reviewer comments or author responses.