Journal of Sustainable Technology in Agriculture Volume 2 • Issue 2 • 2026
JOSTA cover
Review Article ✓ Published Online 🔓 Open Access Peer Reviewed
Received 11 March 2026
Accepted 06 April 2026
Published 08 Apr 2026
ISSN 3107-6882 (Online)  •  License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Download PDF View on Zenodo

Dimensions citations

Crossref citations

times cited

A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Rootstocks in Fruit Crops: Effects on Fruit Quality, Bearing Behavior, and Scion-Rootstock Interactions

Review-Article
Horticulture
Environment
Breeding

Rootstocks are central to modern fruit production, strongly influencing tree vigor, yield, fruit quality, and stress resilience. This review compiles current knowledge on rootstock classification and their functional roles in major fruit crops. Read more …

Authors
Affiliations

Shabbar Ali*

University of Agriculture Faisalabad

Muhammad Arif

University of Agriculture Faisalabad

Saeed Hussain

Karakoram International University

Published

April 8, 2026

Doi
Abstract

Rootstocks are central to modern fruit production, strongly influencing tree vigor, yield, fruit quality, and stress resilience. Through grafting, elite scion cultivars are combined with rootstocks that regulate water and nutrient uptake, hormonal balance, and responses to environmental stress. This review compiles current knowledge on rootstock classification and their functional roles in major fruit crops, emphasizing effects on vegetative growth, precocity, yield efficiency, and orchard lifespan. Contributions to fruit quality size, soluble solids, acidity, color, texture, and nutritional content are highlighted. Physiological and biochemical interactions between scion and rootstock, including water-mineral-hormone signaling and long-distance molecular communication, are discussed. The capacity of rootstocks to mitigate abiotic (drought, salinity, temperature) and biotic (pathogens, nematodes) stresses, as well as graft compatibility and orchard longevity, is examined. Future trends in marker-assisted selection, omics technologies, and precision horticulture are outlined to promote sustainable, high-quality fruit production.

Keywords

Rootstock, Fruit quality, Scion-rootstock interaction, Grafting, Stress tolerance

1 Introduction

Rootstocks are also essential in contemporary fruit crop production, as they regulate the vigor, productivity, adaptability, and fruit quality (Kumar 2024). Grafting in perennial crops enables growers to match the desirable fruiting qualities of elite scion cultivars with the adaptive and regulatory capabilities of selected rootstocks (Dogra et al. 2018). The practice has established itself as a pillar of intensive and sustainable horticultural systems, especially in situations of limited land, shifting climate, and mounting biotic and abiotic strains (J. Xu et al. 2022).

Rootstocks were traditionally used mainly to regulate the size of trees and to facilitate the easier management of the orchard. The initial uses concerning apple, pear, and citrus involved a reduction of vigor, increased early fruiting, and high density planting (Salis et al. 2017). The development of clonal rootstocks expanded their role to include growth management and primarily contributed to the establishment of consistent orchard performance, improved nutrient uptake, and enhanced resistance to soil-related constraints (Sherif, Yoder, and Peck 2020). Breeding programs to help them develop resistance to significant diseases, nematodes, salinity, drought, and extreme temperatures have also engineered rootstocks. However, more recently, studies have emphasized the role of rootstocks in conferring quality related to fruits such as size, color, flavour, and nutritional value, and have shown that rootstocks have multifunctional functionality in fruit production systems (Zhou et al. 2022).

Rootstocks are effective because they can modify the physiological and biochemical interactions between the roots and the scion. Rootstocks control absorption of water and nutrients, hormonal induction, and integrate partitioning, which influence vegetative growth, flowering, fruit set, and development (Zrig et al. 2023). The concentration of hormones, including auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins, and abscisic acid, synthesized by the rootstock or regulated by its concentration, is transported to the scion, where it affects the canopy architecture, reproductive and fruit performance, and quality (Rouphael, Kyriacou, and Colla 2018). The interrelatedness of grafted plants can also be highlighted by the fact that rootstocks can alter the pattern of carbohydrates and genes in the scion (Vittal et al. 2023). Despite extensive research, scion responses to rootstocks are often crop-specific and influenced by environmental conditions, making rootstock selection a critical management decision (Rasool et al. 2020). This study examines these interactions in order to optimize the performance of orchards, achieve high fruit quality, and increase stress tolerance. The current review highlights the existing literature on the role of rootstocks in fruit crops, specifically their impact on fruit quality, reproductive traits, and scion-rootstock interactions. It also outlines the physiological processes that should underlie it and provides the direction of future research to help to make fruit production sustainable and climate-resilient. This comprehensive analysis aims to bridge knowledge gaps in understanding the complex molecular and physiological mechanisms governing rootstock-scion communication, thereby facilitating the development of improved grafting strategies for enhanced fruit quality and resilience.

2 Classification and functions of rootstocks

The rootstocks in fruit crops are mostly categorized in terms of their method of propagation, their growth-regulating capacity, and their functional attributes (Aziz, Salih, and Noori 2024). The classification aids in the comprehension of the impact that various rootstocks have on the performance of scions, as well as assists growers and researchers in choosing appropriate rootstock scion combinations to use in a particular production system (Sharma et al. 2019).

Rootstocks are classified into seedling and clonal depending on the method of propagation. Seedling rootstocks are sexually propagated, and they find extensive application in fruit crops, including mango, citrus, and stone fruits (Kubar et al. 2023). They tend to grow intensively, have a vast root structure, and have enhanced tolerance to dissimilar soil environments. Genetic variability of seedlings, however, can frequently result in a non-uniform tree size and non-uniform orchard performance (Dogra et al. 2018). Conversely, vegetatively propagated clonal rootstocks are genetically identical and offer predictable answers to tree vigour, bearing behaviour, and fruit quality. They are especially appropriate in high-density and precision orchards, as commonly adopted in the production of apples, pears, and grapes, because of their uniformity (Bisht et al. 2024).

Rootstocks are also grouped based on the impact on the scion growth as dwarfing, semi-dwarfing, and vigorous (Table 1). Dwarfing rootstocks minimize vegetative development, accelerate flowering and fruit availability, and enhance the performance of rootstock in yield efficiency, allowing more compact planting and managing the canopy (Iglesias, Botet, and Reig 2024). Balanced rootstocks semi-dwarfing give a regular balance between vegetative and reproductive development, whereas vigorous rootstocks are favored in marginal soil conditions or rain-fed systems where increased root-development and stress-tolerance are needed (Reig et al. 2018).

Rootstocks have a variety of functions other than growth regulation, which are functional. One of the most important functions is vigour control; it affects canopy structure, light distribution, and the longevity of the orchard (Gainza et al. 2015). Rootstocks also play a critical role in abiotic stress resistance, such as salinity, drought, and low-temperature stress, through higher water uptake efficiency, ion transport, and the ability to modify stress-related hormonal signaling (Santhi et al. 2020). Moreover, numerous rootstocks offer resistance to soil-borne fungi and pests, including phytophthora, nematodes, and viral pathogens, to diminish reliance on chemical agents of control (Rouphael, Kyriacou, and Colla 2018). The other significant role of rootstocks is that they affect the nutrient uptake and translocation. Rootstock differs in root structure and physiological processes that influence the space of essential macro- and micronutrient absorption and movement into the scion and eventually influence tree health, yield, and fruit (Valverdi and Kalcsits 2021).

Table 1: Classification and functional roles of rootstocks in major fruit crops
Fruit crop Rootstock type Growth habit Key functional roles
Apple M9, M26 Dwarfing Early bearing, high yield efficiency, improved fruit size
Apple MM106 Semi-dwarfing Balanced vigor, adaptability to varied soils
Citrus Trifoliate orange Vigorous Disease resistance, cold, and salinity tolerance
Grape 110R, 1103P Vigorous Drought tolerance, deep root system
Mango Polyembryonic seedlings Vigorous Uniform growth, adaptability to stress
Pear Quince A Dwarfing Reduced tree size, improved fruit quality

3 Influence of rootstocks on tree growth and bearing behavior

Rootstocks have an immense influence on tree development and bearing phenotypes in fruit crops due to the inhibitory effects they have on the vegetative growth, reproductive ratio, and long-term fruit bearing (Basile and DeJong 2018). Rootstocks vary in root system architecture, hydraulic conductivity, and hormonal signaling, which plants turn into different scion growth development patterns, which eventually determine canopy structure, fruiting patterns, and orchard performance (Tworkoski and Fazio 2015).

3.1 Vegetative growth and canopy architecture

A rootstock is mainly influential by controlling vegetative vigor, which defines the size of trees, the development of shoots, and canopy structures (Ling et al. 2025). Dwarfing rootstocks inhibit the profligate development of vegetative growth by inhibiting the movement of water and nutrients, as well as the flux of hormones, especially auxins and cytokinins (Khan and N 2018). This creates a reduction in the size of canopies and will have shorter internodes as well as even better distribution in the branches. Vigorous rootstocks, on the contrary, encourage more massive shoot growth and bigger canopies, which can be beneficial in both low-density and stress-prone soil conditions but can cause shading and less fruitful performance when not carefully handled (Pal et al. 2017).

Canopy architecture only has a significant effect on light interception and distribution, which affect photosynthesis, flower bud differentiation, and the quality of fruit. Rootstock promoting moderate vigor supplies a good balance between vegetative growth and light penetration, hence overall orchard productivity (Montesinos et al. 2021).

3.2 Precocity and early bearing

Rootstocks influence the initiation of reproductive development or precocity, as it is often known. Dwarf and semi-dwarf rootstocks have been largely linked with early flowering and fruiting as opposed to vigorous seedling rootstocks (Zhou et al. 2022). Such early flowering is explained by the slowed vegetation growth, increased carbohydrate supply to the organs of reproduction, and positive hormonal signals. The elevation of cytokinin levels, which are carried by the rootstock to the scion, is thought to facilitate floral budding and fruit set (Aloni et al. 2010). The ability to bear precociously is a preferred practice in commercial orchards as it gives a quicker payoff in terms of economic value. Excessive precocity damages the tree structure and long-term productivity if early fruit loads are not handled properly by using supervised thinning and pruning techniques (Hayat et al. 2022).

3.3 Yield efficiency and alternate bearing

Rootstocks affect total yield as well as yield efficiency, which is often reported in terms of yield per unit of trunk cross-sectional area or canopy volume (Scalisi et al. 2024). Dwarfing rootstocks tend to have improved yield efficiency, as they are more effective in light use, less vegetative competition, and better assimilate partitioning to fruit (Chu et al. 2025). Rootstocks that facilitate moderate growth and stable carbohydrate reserves tend to suppress alternate bearing severity by facilitating steady flower bud development and fruit establishment across seasons (Vittal et al. 2023). Conversely, highly vigorous rootstocks can cause an increase in the alternate bearing by promoting vegetative growth at the expense of reproductive growth (Milyaev et al. 2021).

3.4 Longevity of the orchard

Rootstocks do not just influence the initial productive endeavors but also the sustainability and longevity of orchards as well. Good anchorage, disease resistance, and stress tolerance of rootstocks help to increase longevity of tree health and stable yields in the long term (Ali 2025). Dwarfing rootstocks provide some benefits, such as early and efficient production; however, they might need intensive management and support mechanisms to guarantee endurance in the long term. Vigorous rootstocks, which take time to bear, can normally increase orchard life in less-than-ideal environments. Rootstocks are, in general, important in influencing the patterns of tree growth, the behavior of bearing, and orchard longevity (Manzoor, Safyan, and Manzoor 2020). Proper rootstock choice is therefore one of the key factors in the attainment of a balance between early productivity, stability under low yield, and the long-term performance of the orchard (Vahdati et al. 2021).

4 Role of rootstocks in fruit quality attributes

Rootstocks are a key factor in defining fruit quality as they regulate physiological, biochemical, and developmental functions of the scion (Ruiz et al. 2020). They influence several essential quality parameters, which include: fruit size and weight, soluble solids (TSS) content, acidity, color formation, texture, shelf life, and nutritional makeup (e.g., vitamin C and phenolic content). These effects are important in understanding what rootstocks to choose to maximize both marketable fruit traits and post-harvest (Shivran et al. 2023).

4.1 Fruit size, weight, and soluble solids

Rootstock vigor and its uptake efficiency have a significant impact on the fruit size and weight. Medium to large uniform fruits are known to be produced by dwarfing and semi-dwarfing rootstocks because restricted vegetative growth causes increased assimilates going to fruits (Biasuz and Kalcsits 2023). Under certain conditions, vigorous rootstocks can yield larger fruit, yet with a greater range because of intense competition between vegetative growth and reproductive sinks (Falchi et al. 2020). Rootstocks also influence TSS, an important index of sweetness and flavor, in the same manner (Lordan et al. 2020). There are literature trends in several crops (Table 2) that demonstrate the overall application of dwarfing and semi-dwarfing rootstocks to increase the TSS levels in the apple, citrus, and mango crops, and that vigorous rootstocks could lead to slightly reduced sugar accumulation. The rootstock selection also regulates acidity, as it affects consumer preference and taste balance.

4.2 Color development, texture, and shelf life

The color of the fruits is closely related to the canopy structure and light interception, which are under the control of vigor brought about by the rootstocks (Lan 2021). Rootstocks that favor optimal canopy density support increased sun access to plants, resulting in high pigment plants and skin color. Rootstocks also affect the texture and firmness of fruits, which affects the shelf life and transportability (Gong et al. 2022). Semi-dwarfing rootstocks can lead to firmer fruit with a better storage life, and a vigorous rootstock can even give softer fruit should vegetative growth become dominant (Lawrence et al. 2025).

4.3 Nutritional quality

Rootstocks may influence vitamin, phenolic, and antioxidant concentration in fruits by adjusting the uptake of nutrients and resiliency under stress. Mango and apple are examples of clonal rootstock that have been linked with increased vitamin C and phenolic concentrations, which improve the nutritional and functional value of fruits (Oustric et al. 2021). A clear comparative summary of fruit quality characteristics of various rootstocks of apple, citrus, grape, and mango is provided in (Table 2). The table reveals trends that include increased TSS in dwarfing or semi- dwarfing rootstock, extended size of the fruit under vigorous rootstock, and acidic differences in different species (Tietel et al. 2020). This table summary will help readers to easily comprehend crop-specific rootstock impacts and make certain selections to apply them in practical horticultural practices.The combination of the table and radar chart will allow readers to quantify changes and evaluate multi-trait patterns orally, making the review even more understandable and effective.

Table 2: Effect of root stocks on fruit quality parameters
Crop Rootstock Fruit Size TSS (%) Acidity (%) Key Reference
Apple M9 (dwarfing) Medium 14 0.6 (Shuttleworth, Newman, and Korkos 2023)
Apple MM106 (semi-vigorous) Large 12 0.5 (Yavari et al. 2022)
Citrus Trifoliate orange Medium 13 0.8 (Kim and Shin 2012)
Citrus Rough lemon Large 11 1.0 (Goswami et al. 2013)
Grape 110R (vigorous) Large 18 0.4 (Geier et al. 2008)
Grape SO4 (vigorous) Medium 16 0.5 (De Medeiros Câmara et al. 2025)
Mango Clonal rootstock Large 16 0.3 (Simon et al. 2010)
Mango Seedling rootstock Medium 14 0.4 (Jain, Sankaran, and Dinesh 2024)

5 Physiological and biochemical basis of scion–rootstock interactions

The physiological and biochemical pathways make this a complex network of processes that control the level of vigor, production, and quality of the fruits in scion-rootstock interactions (Lu et al. 2020). The rootstock is not simply a scaffolding system but a working control of water relations, mineral nutrition, hormonal communication, and long-range molecular communication (Bell and Horvath 2020). Combinations of those processes define scion growth dynamics, which in turn affect fruit development and adaptation to stressors.

5.1 Water relations and hydraulic conductivity

Control of plant water relations is among the main ways through which rootstocks affect the performance of scions. Rootstocks vary greatly in root system structure, xylem structure, and hydraulic conductivity, and such differing traits directly influence water intake and conveyance into the scion (Casagrande-Biasuz and Kalcsits 2021). Rootstocks that are more hydraulically conductive tend to promote higher transpiration rates, stronger stomatal conductance, and greater vegetative development. Dwarfing or semi-dwarfing rootstocks, in their turn, tend to create hydraulic constraints limiting the flow of water, which leads to the low activity of scions (H. Xu and Ediger 2021). Hydraulic resistance can further adjust the transport of water at the graft union. Continuity changes in the water column could be affected by differences in vessel diameter, vessel density, and xylem connectivity between scion and rootstock (Rossdeutsch et al. 2021). In water-limited environments, scion drought resistance is improved similarly by rootstocks that efficiently use water and have a conservative water-use behavior, which preserves the water potential to the leaf and minimizes unnecessary transpiration. These abiotic stress-related changes are essential in supporting fruit development and quality mediated by this rootstock (Villalobos-Soublett et al. 2022).

5.2 Mineral nutrition uptake and translocation

Rootstocks have high levels of control in the acquisition and translocation of mineral nutrients to the scion. Root morphology variability, root surface area, and membrane transporters are known to affect the uptake of important macro and micronutrients like nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium, and iron (Lynch et al. 2021). Rootstocks that are suited to the specific soil conditions (e.g., calcareous soils or saline soils) may enhance the nutrient levels and avert physiological diseases in the scion. When absorbed, the nutrients should be actively carried to the tissues above the ground (Biniam, Kebede, and Derbew 2021). Rootstocks also affect xylem loading, phloem load, and nutrient partitioning between vegetative and reproductive organs. As an example, the better calcium translocation into developing fruits is related to lower cases of bitter pit and fruit firmness (Larocca, Baldi, and Toselli 2025). In the same way, the availability of nitrogen and potassium regulates fruit size, sugar accumulation, and acidity. In this way, the selection of rootstock receives the direct implication on fruit composition and postharvest quality (Wang and Gao 2025).

5.3 Hormonal signaling between rootstock and scion

Scion-rootstock interactions occur via hormonal signaling, a key biochemical process. Various phytohormones are synthesized and exported by the roots, containing cytokinins, gibberellins, abscisic acid (ABA), and auxins, transported acropetally to the scion via the xylem (Habibi et al. 2022). These hormones coordinate the growth of the shoot, the expansion of leaves, flowering, fruit set, and stress.

The cytokinins synthesized in the rootstock stimulate the division of cells, retard the senescence of leaves, and increase sink strength in growing fruits. Dwarfing rootstocks are frequently linked to lower cytokinin flux, resulting in compact canopy construction and reproductive precocity (Verma et al. 2024). Gibberellins affect the internode growth and growth of fruits, and auxins affect the vascular differentiation and apical dominance at the graft union (Jahed and Hirst 2023). ABA is also a major stress signal molecule, especially during drought. ABA produced by the rootstock can control stomatal closure in the scion, leading to less water loss and increased tolerance to stress (Jiao et al. 2023). These hormones and their interaction with each other are vital in determining scion development patterns and fruit development patterns.

5.4 Gene expression and long-distance signaling

In addition to classical physiological mechanisms, recent reports have shown the role of long-range molecular signaling in the interactions between scions and rootstocks. Small fragments of RNA (mobile RNAs), proteins, and peptides have the ability to cross the graft union and affect the expression of genes in distant tissues (Jeynes-Cupper and Catoni 2023). These signals potentially control developmental processes, stress response, and metabolic pathways in the scion. Rootstocks have the capability of causing alterations in the expression of scion gene concerning the production of hormones, transportation of nutrients, and stress-related responses (Kapazoglou et al. 2021). This is an emerging field, but it is becoming clear that transcriptional reprogramming induced by rootstock can add to long-term phenotypic stability and the capacity to adapt new environments in grafted plants (Harris et al. 2023). The integrated physiological and biochemical map of scion-rootstock interactions is depicted in (Figure 1). The rootstock processes the interaction of the soil environment, taking in water and nutrients, synthesizing, and sending hormonal signals to the scion, producing systemic signals that control fruit development (Gautier et al. 2021). The processes come all together at the scion level, where growth vigor, yield, and fruit quality characteristics like size, firmness, and stress resistance are determined (Bu et al. 2025).

Figure 1: Rootstocks and abiotic and biotic stress tolerance

6 Rootstocks and abiotic and biotic stress tolerance

Rootstocks will play a crucial role in increasing the resilience of scions to abiotic and biotic stress. Rootstocks serve as a buffer by regulating nutrient and water uptake, physiological responses, and defense mechanisms to maintain a consistent level of growth, fruit production, and quality even in adverse environmental conditions (Vives-Peris et al. 2024).

6.1 Drought and salinity tolerance

One of the key limitations to horticulture production is drought and salinity. Deep-rooted or extensive rootstock enhances the process of water acquisition and sustains hydraulic conductivity when water is insufficient (Kumar 2024). Rootstocks that are salt-tolerant inhibit sodium intake or isolate the ions in vacuoles, shielding the scion against osmotic and ionic pressure. These adaptations assure photosynthetic characterization, flowering, and fruit set (Shao et al. 2021). The (Table 3) provides a summary of biotic and abiotic-tolerant rootstocks in the major crops, and they are examples of such rootstocks. Drastic temperature changes may have devastating effects on the plant metabolism and growth. Cold-tolerant rootstocks increase frost resistance through stabilizing cell membranes and facilitating the accumulation of osmoprotectants (Lee et al. 2023). High heat levels enhance rootstocks that tolerate heat as they maintain transpiration and enzymatic functions in the presence of higher temperatures. The effects of these rootstocks have the benefit of sustaining scion growth and fruit development under unfavorable thermal environments, as schematically depicted in the stress buffering (Hashem et al. 2023). Rootstocks are used as an initial line of resistance to soil-borne pathogens and nematodes. The resistant rootstocks may restrict the invasion of the pathogen or evoke the systemic acquired resistance of the scion, eliminating the disease and avoiding vascular blockage (Chen et al. 2024). Rootstocks that are resistant to nematodes preserve nutrient and water movement, as root galling is inhibited, which preserves the scion vigor (Thies and Panthee 2023).

Table 3: Stress-tolerant rootstocks and their associated abiotic and biotic resistance traits
Stress Crop Rootstock Benefit Study References
Drought Grapevine 1103P, 140Ru Improved water-use efficiency (Labarga et al. 2023)
Salinity Tomato Maxifort Na⁺ exclusion, sustained growth (Sarkar et al. 2025)
Cold Apple MM.106 Membrane stability, reduced frost injury (Jahed, Saini, and Sherif 2023)
Heat Citrus Carrizo Thermotolerance, maintained photosynthesis (Balfagón et al. 2018)
Nematodes Tomato Nemaguard Resistance to root-knot nematodes (El-Sappah et al. 2019)
Diseases Stone fruits GF-677 Resistance to Phytophthora and bacterial canker (Ling et al. 2025)

6.2 Indirect effects on fruit quality under stress

Stress-tolerant rootstocks, in addition to survival and growth, result in the reliability of fruit quality during stress (Feng et al. 2023). Their stabilization of water and nutrient supply also maintains sugar accumulation, acidity, and secondary metabolite profiles (Abdulaziz et al. 2017). This buffering capacity reduces fruit size, fruit firmness, and fruit flavor variability, which guarantees predictable marketable quality (Musacchi and Serra 2018). In the (Figure 2) illustrates the general process of stress mitigation by rootstock buffering, where all manners of abiotic and biotic stresses are mitigated to make scion performance stable. Environmental stressors, including drought, salinity, cold stress, heat stress, disease and pest pressure, and nematodes, impose physiological and biotic constraints on grafted plants. Tolerant rootstocks mitigate these stresses through enhanced water and nutrient uptake, selective ion exclusion (e.g., Na⁺ and Cl⁻), and activation of stress tolerance and disease resistance signaling pathways. These buffering mechanisms improve resource acquisition and reduce stress-induced damage, thereby supporting sustained vegetative growth, stable yield, and scion.

Figure 2: Rootstock buffering of abiotic and biotic stresses supports stable scion performance

7 Compatibility issues and long-term orchard performance

One of the key factors that defines the longevity and performance of an orchard is graft compatibility. When two varieties are incompatible, this can result in a number of anatomical and physiological incompatibilities, which may impair tree performance (Khanchana et al. 2024).

7.1 Graft incompatibility: anatomical and physiological aspects

Graft incompatibility can be described as being either anatomical or physiological. Anatomical incompatibility occurs when there is a failure of alignment of the vascular tissues of the scion and rootstock, resulting in a poor union, bark incompatibility, and a structurally weak graft (Loupit and Cookson 2020). Physiological incompatibility, on the other hand, is not as easy to observe. Even if a successful graft union has been achieved, physiological incompatibility may result in a reduction in the performance of the grafted plant (Moghadam et al. 2022).

7.2 Symptoms and etiology

The symptoms appear gradually. Initial symptoms may be swelling, cracking, or discoloring of tissue at the graft union, slow growth, chlorosis of leaves, and irregular development of the tree canopy (McCann 2020). Later, symptoms may appear as dieback of branches, reduction in fruiting, and sudden failure of structural integrity during stress (Tipu et al. 2021). Etiology involves genetic incompatibility, environmental stress, virus infection, and poor grafting techniques.

7.3 Long-term yield decline

Even well-established grafts may experience long-term decline if there is incompatibility. Poor vascular connections compromise water and nutrient transport, resulting in reduced vigor and fruiting of the scion (Frey et al. 2021). Eventually, this may result in a reduction in yield, fruit size, and increased susceptibility to environmental stresses and diseases. Early recognition of compatibility issues is important for effective management (Manik et al. 2019).

7.4 Importance of compatibility screening

Compatibility screening is a vital component of rootstock and scion combination selection. Assays, trials, and anatomical studies can be employed to assess compatibility in a controlled environment, as opposed to a commercial setting (Thompson et al. 2017). Such a process reduces potential financial loss, facilitates uniform establishment, and optimizes long-term productivity (Aydın et al. 2025). The (Figure 3) demonstrates a clear visual differentiation of a graft union. The visual on the left shows a compatible union, as demonstrated by continuous vascular tissues, aligned cambium, and free water/nutrient transport. Conversely, the visual on the right shows an incompatible union, as demonstrated by disrupted vascular tissues, non-aligned cambium, and potential cracks in the interface. Such a visual representation demonstrates a direct correlation between anatomical alignment and physiological performance, thus emphasizing the significance of rootstock selection (Çoban and Öztürk 2020).

Figure 3: Cross-section diagram of graft union

8 Future prospects and research gaps

Significant advancements in rootstock science are being made possible through the application of molecular biology, precision horticulture, and breeding for climate change resilience (Roberto, Novello, and Fazio 2022). One of the promising areas of research is the application of molecular markers for scion-rootstock compatibility. Molecular markers, also known as DNA markers, help predict scion-rootstock compatibility, which would greatly help in avoiding trial and error in nurseries (Gomès, Maillot, and Duchêne 2021). Breeding of rootstocks for climate change also offers a major research frontier. As environmental stresses such as drought, salinity, heat, and cold become increasingly common, there is a pressing need to develop rootstocks that can protect scions against a range of environmental stresses (Bernardo et al. 2025). The application of traditional breeding coupled with genomic selection would help accelerate the development of multi-stress-tolerant rootstocks, ensuring maximum yields as well as fruit quality under different environmental conditions (Mancosu et al. 2015). The rootstock-environment interaction is a major research gap. The performance of a rootstock is highly dependent upon environmental factors, which include soil type, microclimate, and orchard management. Field trials of rootstocks under different environmental conditions are essential (Gentile et al. 2022).

The application of omics techniques, including transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics, along with precision horticulture techniques, including high-throughput phenotyping and real-time soil and plant monitoring, enables the acquisition of unprecedented knowledge regarding the role of rootstocks in response mechanisms (Ben-Laouane et al. 2026). The (Figure 4) shows the proposed conceptual roadmap for the advancement of rootstock research in the near future. The diagram places “Rootstock Performance & Orchard Resilience” at the core and demonstrates the relationship between the application of molecular markers, climate resilience, environment interactions, and omics/precision horticulture techniques for the improvement of scion stability and productivity. The arrows in the diagram indicate the direct and indirect relationships between the different research fields, including the relationship between the application of omics techniques and the application of climate resilience, and the relationship between the application of precision horticulture techniques and the application of environmental interactions. The diagram also highlights the interconnected relationships between the different research fields, demonstrating the complexity of the pathways from the application of the different techniques and the acquisition of knowledge regarding the improvement of horticultural productivity in the near future.

Figure 4: Conceptual roadmap for future advancements in rootstock research

9 Conclusion

Rootstocks are key factors that determine the quality and quantity of the produced fruit as well as the performance of the orchard. The role of the rootstock is not limited to the provision of mechanical support to the scion. Rather, a dynamic regulator protects the scion from various stresses while maintaining its productivity. The performance of the rootstock is closely related to its physiological interactions with the scion. For instance, anatomical, biochemical, and hormonal compatibility are key to the efficiency of the rootstock. The compatibility of the scion and the rootstock determines the efficiency of the transport of water, nutrients, and metabolites. Incompatible interactions can lead to weak graft unions, progressive decline, and reduced productivity. As such, it is essential to comprehend these interactions at the molecular and phenotypic levels. The successful use of rootstocks is closely related to the crop and the region. The performance of the rootstock is influenced by environmental factors such as soil type and local stress pressures. As such, it is not possible to provide general guidelines for the use of rootstocks. The use of knowledge of the local conditions, stress tolerance, and compatibility is essential to ensure that the use of the rootstock is beneficial to the scion. In the near future, the use of knowledge from the advances made in the use of molecular markers, omics technology, and precision horticulture will provide the means to optimize the use of the rootstock as well as the prediction of stress tolerance. In conclusion, the strategic use of the rootstock is the key to the sustainability of high-quality fruit production. As such, it is imperative to acknowledge the pivotal role that the use of the rootstock plays in the horticulture sector.

References

Abdulaziz, A., A. Abdulrasoul, A. Thabet, A. Hesham, A. Khadejah, M. Saad, and O. Abdullah. 2017. “Tomato Grafting Impacts on Yield and Fruit Quality Under Water Stress Conditions.” Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 5 (Spl-1-SAFSAW): 136–47. https://doi.org/10.18006/2017.5(spl-1-safsaw).s136.s147.
Ali, U. 2025. “Dwarf Apple Rootstock Stress Responses: A Key to Climate-Resilient Apple Cultivation Amidst Abiotic and Biotic Challenges.” Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 13: 2553–60. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13is1.2553-2560.8122.
Aloni, B., R. Cohen, L. Karni, H. Aktas, and M. Edelstein. 2010. “Hormonal Signaling in Rootstock–Scion Interactions.” Scientia Horticulturae 127: 119–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.003.
Aydın, E., M. A. Cengiz, E. Er, and H. Demirsoy. 2025. “Identifying Graft Incompatible Rootstocks for Sweet Cherry Through Machine Learning Algorithms.” PLOS ONE 20 (10): e0332889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0332889.
Aziz, R. R., F. M. H. Salih, and I. M. Noori. 2024. “Compatibility Studies of Loquat Scions with Loquat and Quince Rootstocks.” arXiv Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.11451.
Balfagón, D., S. I. Zandalinas, P. Baliño, M. Muriach, and A. Gómez-Cadenas. 2018. “Involvement of Ascorbate Peroxidase and Heat Shock Proteins on Citrus Tolerance to Combined Conditions of Drought and High Temperatures.” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 127: 194–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.03.021.
Basile, B., and T. M. DeJong. 2018. “Control of Fruit Tree Vigor Induced by Dwarfing Rootstocks.” In Horticultural Reviews, 39–97. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119521082.ch2.
Bell, E. M., and A. Horvath. 2020. “Modeling the Carbon Footprint of Fresh Produce: Effects of Transportation, Localness, and Seasonality on US Orange Markets.” Environmental Research Letters 15 (3): 034040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2f.
Ben-Laouane, R., A. Boutasknit, M. Ait-El-Mokhtar, and M. Baslam. 2026. “Engineering Resilience in Woody Plants: Multi-Omics, Genome Editing, and Microbiome Strategies to Boost Abiotic Stress Tolerance.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1670566.
Bernardo, S., E. Marguerit, N. Ollat, G. A. Gambetta, C. S. Cast, and M. De Miguel. 2025. “Root System Ideotypes: What Is the Potential for Breeding Drought-Tolerant Grapevine Rootstocks?” Journal of Experimental Botany 76 (11): 2970–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf006.
Biasuz, E. C., and L. Kalcsits. 2023. “Rootstock Effects on Leaf Function and Isotope Composition in Apple Occurred on Both Scion Grafted and Ungrafted Rootstocks Under Hydroponic Conditions.” Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1274195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1274195.
Biniam, B., J. Kebede, and B. Derbew. 2021. “Effects of Rootstocks on Leaf Nutrient Concentration of Selected Apple (Malus Domestica l. Borkh) Cultivars at Gircha, Southern Ethiopia.” Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development 13 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.5897/jabsd2021.0384.
Bisht, V., J. M. Rawat, K. S. Gaira, S. Purohit, J. Anand, S. Sinha, D. Mitra, et al. 2024. “Assessment of Genetic Homogeneity of in-Vitro Propagated Apple Root Stock MM 104 Using ISSR and SCoT Primers.” BMC Plant Biology 24: 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04939-3.
Bu, H., X. Sun, Y. Hu, G. Gu, Y. Yang, and W. Yu. 2025. “Research Advances in the Regulation of Fruit Size: An Integrated Perspective of Genetic, Hormonal, Epigenetic, and Environmental Control.” Biology 14 (12): 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14121643.
Casagrande-Biasuz, E., and L. Kalcsits. 2021. “Variation in Scion Water Relations Mediated by Two Newly Released Geneva Series Rootstocks.” bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.20.453132.
Chen, Y., Y. Fei, K. Howell, D. Chen, P. Clingeleffer, and P. Zhang. 2024. “Rootstocks for Grapevines Now and into the Future: Selection of Rootstocks Based on Drought Tolerance, Soil Nutrient Availability, and Soil pH.” Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6704238.
Chu, L., D. Liu, C. Li, and J. Liu. 2025. “Dwarfing of Fruit Trees: From Old Cognitions to New Insights.” Horticulture Advances 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44281-025-00063-w.
Çoban, N., and A. Öztürk. 2020. “Effect of the Rootstock and Cultivar on Graft Success and Sapling Development and Graft Incompatibility in Pear.” Uluslararası Tarım Ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (3): 371–81. https://doi.org/10.24180/ijaws.782502.
De Medeiros Câmara, F. M., C. R. De Souza, R. V. Da Mota, N. P. Bernardo, L. F. C. Lucas, F. De Paula Fernandes, L. B. D. Amaral, and I. Peregrino. 2025. “Rootstock Influence on the Performance of Field-Grown Grapevines (Vitis Vinifera) During Autumn-Winter Harvest.” OENO One 59 (3): 8460.
Dogra, K., K. Kour, R. Kumar, P. Bakshi, and V. Kumar. 2018. “Graft-Incompatibility in Horticultural Crops.” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 1805–20. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.218.
El-Sappah, A. H., H. H. El-Awady, S. Yan, S. Qi, J. Liu, G. Cheng, and Y. Liang. 2019. “Tomato Natural Resistance Genes in Controlling the Root-Knot Nematode.” Genes 10 (11): 925. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110925.
Falchi, R., C. Bonghi, M. F. Drincovich, F. Famiani, M. V. Lara, R. P. Walker, and G. Vizzotto. 2020. “Sugar Metabolism in Stone Fruit: Source–Sink Relationships and Environmental and Agronomical Effects.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 573982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.573982.
Feng, M., F. Augstein, A. Kareem, and C. W. Melnyk. 2023. “Plant Grafting: Molecular Mechanisms and Applications.” Molecular Plant 17 (1): 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2023.12.006.
Frey, C., R. Álvarez, A. Encina, and J. L. Acebes. 2021. “Tomato Graft Union Failure Is Associated with Alterations in Tissue Development and the Onset of Cell Wall Defense Responses.” Agronomy 11 (6): 1197. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061197.
Gainza, F., I. Opazo, V. Guajardo, P. Meza, M. Ortiz, J. Pinochet, and C. Muñoz. 2015. “Rootstock Breeding in Prunus Species: Ongoing Efforts and New Challenges.” Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 75: 6–16. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-58392015000300002.
Gautier, A. T., I. Merlin, P. Doumas, N. Cochetel, A. Mollier, P. Vivin, V. Lauvergeat, B. Péret, and S. J. Cookson. 2021. “Identifying Roles of the Scion and the Rootstock in Regulating Plant Development and Functioning Under Different Phosphorus Supplies in Grapevine.” Environmental and Experimental Botany 185: 104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104405.
Geier, T., K. Eimert, R. Scherer, and C. Nickel. 2008. “Production and Rooting Behaviour of rolB-Transgenic Plants of Grape Rootstock ’Richter 110’ (Vitis Berlandieri × v. Rupestris).” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 94 (3): 269–80.
Gentile, R. M., H. L. Boldingh, R. E. Campbell, M. Gee, N. Gould, P. Lo, S. McNally, et al. 2022. “System Nutrient Dynamics in Orchards: A Research Roadmap for Nutrient Management in Apple and Kiwifruit. A Review.” Agronomy for Sustainable Development 42 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00798-0.
Gomès, É., P. Maillot, and É. Duchêne. 2021. “Molecular Tools for Adapting Viticulture to Climate Change.” Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 633846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.633846.
Gong, T., J. K. Brecht, S. F. Hutton, K. E. Koch, and X. Zhao. 2022. “Tomato Fruit Quality Is More Strongly Affected by Scion Type and Planting Season Than by Rootstock Type.” Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 948556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.948556.
Goswami, K., R. Sharma, P. K. Singh, and G. Singh. 2013. “Micropropagation of Seedless Lemon (Citrus Limon l. Cv. Kaghzi Kalan) and Assessment of Genetic Fidelity of Micropropagated Plants Using RAPD Markers.” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 19 (1): 137–45.
Habibi, F., T. Liu, K. Folta, and A. Sarkhosh. 2022. “Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Aspects of Grafting in Fruit Trees.” Horticulture Research 9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac032.
Harris, Z. N., J. E. Pratt, L. G. Kovacs, L. L. Klein, M. T. Kwasniewski, J. P. Londo, A. S. Wu, and A. J. Miller. 2023. “Grapevine Scion Gene Expression Is Driven by Rootstock and Environment Interaction.” BMC Plant Biology 23 (1): 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04223-w.
Hashem, A., Y. Bayoumi, A. E. El-Zawily, M. Tester, and M. Rakha. 2023. “Interspecific Hybrid Rootstocks Improve Productivity of Tomato Grown Under High-Temperature Stress.” HortScience 59 (1): 129–37. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci17482-23.
Hayat, F., J. Li, S. Iqbal, Y. Peng, L. Hong, R. M. Balal, M. N. Khan, et al. 2022. “A Mini Review of Citrus Rootstocks and Their Role in High-Density Orchards.” Plants 11: 2876. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212876.
Iglesias, I., R. Botet, and G. Reig. 2024. “Combining New Rootstocks and Training Systems for Sustainable Production in Deciduous Tree Crops.” Acta Horticulturae 1395: 187–96. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1395.25.
Jahed, K. R., and P. M. Hirst. 2023. “Fruit Growth and Development in Apple: A Molecular, Genomics and Epigenetics Perspective.” Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1122397. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1122397.
Jahed, K. R., A. K. Saini, and S. M. Sherif. 2023. “Coping with the Cold: Unveiling Cryoprotectants, Molecular Signaling Pathways, and Strategies for Cold Stress Resilience.” Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1246093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1246093.
Jain, N. R. S., M. Sankaran, and M. R. Dinesh. 2024. “Recent Advances in Rootstock Breeding of Mango.” Journal of Horticultural Sciences 19 (2): 2362.
Jeynes-Cupper, K., and M. Catoni. 2023. “Long Distance Signalling and Epigenetic Changes in Crop Grafting.” Frontiers in Plant Science 14: 1121704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1121704.
Jiao, S., F. Zeng, Y. Huang, L. Zhang, J. Mao, and B. Chen. 2023. “Physiological, Biochemical and Molecular Responses Associated with Drought Tolerance in Grafted Grapevine.” BMC Plant Biology 23 (1): 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04109-x.
Kapazoglou, A., E. Tani, E. V. Avramidou, E. M. Abraham, M. Gerakari, S. Megariti, G. Doupis, and A. G. Doulis. 2021. “Epigenetic Changes and Transcriptional Reprogramming Upon Woody Plant Grafting for Crop Sustainability in a Changing Environment.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 613004. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.613004.
Khan, T., and P. N. 2018. “Morphological Characterization of Apple Varieties Found in Yasin Valley, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan.” Forestry Research and Engineering International Journal 2. https://doi.org/10.15406/freij.2018.02.00021.
Khanchana, K., A. Siddiqua, P. Tanuja, S. Koushal, R. P. Singh, A. P. Singh, D. J, and C. Venkatesh. 2024. “A Comprehensive Review of Advancements in Grafting Techniques for Apple Tree Development.” International Journal of Research in Agronomy 7 (9): 265–68. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i9d.1517.
Kim, S., and K. Shin. 2012. “Bioactivity of Trifoliate Orange (Poncirus Trifoliata) Seed Extracts.” Preventive Nutrition and Food Science 17 (2): 136–40.
Kubar, I. H., N. U. N. Memon, N. Sharif, M. I. Majeedano, M. F. Jamali, H. A. Magsi, F. F. Abbasi, and K. Aslam. 2023. “Comparative Study of Rootstocks and Their Effects on Stionic Establishment of the Mango Seedlings.” Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology 20: 146–52. https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2023.20.02.778.
Kumar, A. 2024. “New Approaches of Root Stocks in Fruit Production: A Review.” Open Access Journal of Botanical Insights 2: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.23880/oajbi-16000109.
Labarga, D., A. Mairata, M. Puelles, I. Martín, A. Albacete, E. García-Escudero, and A. Pou. 2023. “The Rootstock Genotypes Determine Drought Tolerance by Regulating Aquaporin Expression at the Transcript Level and Phytohormone Balance.” Plants 12 (4): 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040718.
Lan, W. 2021. “Applications Using Infrared Spectroscopy to Detect and Bridge the Variability and Heterogeneity Before and After Fruit Processing: A Case Study on Apple Purees.” PhD thesis, HAL Open Science. https://theses.hal.science/tel-04045700.
Larocca, G. N., E. Baldi, and M. Toselli. 2025. “Understanding the Role of Calcium in Kiwifruit: Ion Transport, Signaling, and Fruit Quality.” Horticulturae 11 (3): 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11030335.
Lawrence, B. T., G. Fazio, L. G. Nieto, and T. L. Robinson. 2025. “Rootstock Effect on Horticultural Performance and Fruit Quality Is Not Uniform Across Five Commercial Apple Cultivars in Western New York.” Frontiers in Plant Science 16: 1552625. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1552625.
Lee, Y., N. V. Hoang, V. D. Giap, T. M. Foster, T. K. McGhie, S. Kim, S. J. Yang, J. Park, and J. Lee. 2023. “Identification of Genes Associated with the Regulation of Cold Tolerance and the RNA Movement in the Grafted Apple.” Scientific Reports 13 (1): 11583. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38571-2.
Ling, J., W. Yu, L. Yang, J. Zhang, F. Jiang, M. Zhang, Y. Wang, and H. Sun. 2025. “Rootstock Breeding of Stone Fruits Under Modern Cultivation Regime: Current Status and Perspectives.” Plants 14 (9): 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14091320.
Lordan, J., P. Francescatto, G. Fazio, and T. Robinson. 2020. “Effects of Apple Rootstocks on Nutrient Concentration in ‘Honeycrisp’ Scions in the Early Orchard Life.” Acta Horticulturae 1281: 97–104. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2020.1281.15.
Loupit, G., and S. J. Cookson. 2020. “Identifying Molecular Markers of Successful Graft Union Formation and Compatibility.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 610352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.610352.
Lu, X., W. Liu, T. Wang, J. Zhang, X. Li, and W. Zhang. 2020. “Systemic Long-Distance Signaling and Communication Between Rootstock and Scion in Grafted Vegetables.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 460. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00460.
Lynch, J. P., C. F. Strock, H. M. Schneider, J. S. Sidhu, I. Ajmera, T. Galindo-Castañeda, S. P. Klein, and M. T. Hanlon. 2021. “Root Anatomy and Soil Resource Capture.” Plant and Soil 466 (1–2): 21–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05010-y.
Mancosu, N., R. Snyder, G. Kyriakakis, and D. Spano. 2015. “Water Scarcity and Future Challenges for Food Production.” Water 7 (3): 975–92. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7030975.
Manik, S. M. N., G. Pengilley, G. Dean, B. Field, S. Shabala, and M. Zhou. 2019. “Soil and Crop Management Practices to Minimize the Impact of Waterlogging on Crop Productivity.” Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00140.
Manzoor, H., M. Safyan, and F. Manzoor. 2020. “Trade Competitiveness of Pakistan’s Fruits and Vegetables in World Market.” Global Regional Review 5 (IV): 135–43. https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(v-iv).14.
McCann, S. 2020. “Graft Failure.” Bone Marrow Transplantation 55 (10): 1888–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-020-0860-2.
Milyaev, A., J. Kofler, I. Klaiber, S. Czemmel, J. Pfannstiel, H. Flachowsky, D. Stefanelli, M. Hanke, and J. Wünsche. 2021. “Toward Systematic Understanding of Flower Bud Induction in Apple: A Multi-Omics Approach.” Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 604810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.604810.
Moghadam, E. G., S. Arghavan, A. Fahadan, and M. Zamanipour. 2022. “Possibility of Early Detection of Graft Incompatibility in Some Commercial Plum Cultivars by Phenolic Compounds Analysis.” Journal of Horticultural Sciences 17 (2): 488–95. https://doi.org/10.24154/jhs.v17i2.1047.
Montesinos, Á., G. Thorp, J. Grimplet, and M. Rubio-Cabetas. 2021. “Phenotyping Almond Orchards for Architectural Traits Influenced by Rootstock Choice.” Horticulturae 7: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7070159.
Musacchi, S., and S. Serra. 2018. “Apple Fruit Quality: Overview on Pre-Harvest Factors.” Scientia Horticulturae 234: 409–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.12.057.
Oustric, J., S. Herbette, R. Morillon, J. Giannettini, L. Berti, and J. Santini. 2021. “Influence of Rootstock Genotype and Ploidy Level on Common Clementine (Citrus Clementina Hort. Ex Tan) Tolerance to Nutrient Deficiency.” Frontiers in Plant Science 12: 634237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.634237.
Pal, M. D., I. Mitre, A. C. Asănică, A. F. Sestraş, A. G. Peticilă, and V. Mitre. 2017. “The Influence of Rootstock on the Growth and Fructification of Cherry Cultivars in a High Density Cultivation System.” Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 45: 451–57. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha45210826.
Rasool, A., S. Mansoor, K. M. Bhat, G. I. Hassan, T. R. Baba, M. N. Alyemeni, A. A. Alsahli, H. A. El-Serehy, B. A. Paray, and P. Ahmad. 2020. “Mechanisms Underlying Graft Union Formation and Rootstock Scion Interaction in Horticultural Plants.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 590847. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.590847.
Reig, G., C. F. I. Forcada, L. Mestre, J. A. Betrán, and M. Á. Moreno. 2018. “Potential of New Prunus Cerasifera Based Rootstocks for Adapting Under Heavy and Calcareous Soil Conditions.” Scientia Horticulturae 234: 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.037.
Roberto, S. R., V. Novello, and G. Fazio. 2022. “Editorial: New Rootstocks for Fruit Crops: Breeding Programs, Current Use, Future Potential, Challenges and Alternative Strategies.” Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 878863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.878863.
Rossdeutsch, L., R. P. Schreiner, P. A. Skinkis, and L. Deluc. 2021. “Nitrate Uptake and Transport Properties of Two Grapevine Rootstocks with Varying Vigor.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 608813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.608813.
Rouphael, Y., M. C. Kyriacou, and G. Colla. 2018. “Vegetable Grafting: A Toolbox for Securing Yield Stability Under Multiple Stress Conditions.” Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 2255. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02255.
Ruiz, M., J. Oustric, J. Santini, and R. Morillon. 2020. “Synthetic Polyploidy in Grafted Crops.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 540894. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.540894.
Salis, C., I. E. Papadakis, S. Kintzios, and M. Hagidimitriou. 2017. “In Vitro Propagation and Assessment of Genetic Relationships of Citrus Rootstocks Using ISSR Molecular Markers.” Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 45: 383–91. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha45210900.
Santhi, V., N. Nireshkumar, C. Vasugi, S. Parthiban, and P. Masilamani. 2020. “Role of Rootstocks to Mitigate Biotic and Abiotic Stresses in Tropical and Subtropical Fruit Crops: A Review.” International Journal of Chemical Studies 8: 499–510. https://doi.org/10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5g.10348.
Sarkar, M. D., M. A. Mousa, O. H. Ibrahim, and M. T. Naznin. 2025. “Genotype-Specific Grafting of Tomato Under Saline Water Irrigation: Conferring Physiological Adaptation, Ion Homeostasis, Antioxidant Activity and Yield.” Scientia Horticulturae 355: 114569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114569.
Scalisi, A., T. Plozza, P. Reddy, M. Peavey, L. McClymont, S. Rochfort, D. Stefanelli, and I. Goodwin. 2024. “Localised and Tree Total Crop Loads Influence Trunk Growth, Return Fruit Set, Yield, and Fruit Quality in Apples.” Horticulture Advances 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44281-024-00045-4.
Shao, Y., Y. Cheng, H. Pang, M. Chang, F. He, M. Wang, D. J. Davis, et al. 2021. “Investigation of Salt Tolerance Mechanisms Across a Root Developmental Gradient in Almond Rootstocks.” Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 595055. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.595055.
Sharma, M. K., R. Bhat, N. Nazir, A. Khalil, S. A. Simnani, and A. S. Sundouri. 2019. “Influence of Rootstocks on Scion Growth and Vigour, Production, Water Relations, Physiology and Leaf Nutrient Status of Temperate Fruit Crops – a Review.” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.128.
Sherif, S., K. S. Yoder, and G. M. Peck. 2020. “Effects of Dwarfing and Semi-Dwarfing Apple Rootstocks on the Growth and Yield of ‘Gala,’ ‘Fuji’ and ‘York’ Apples.” Acta Horticulturae 1281: 113–20. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2020.1281.17.
Shivran, M., N. Sharma, A. K. Dubey, S. K. Singh, V. Muthusamy, M. Jain, B. P. Singh, N. Kumar, S. Sethi, and R. M. Sharma. 2023. “Scion/Rootstock Interaction Studies for Quality Traits in Mango (Mangifera Indica l.) Varieties.” Agronomy 13 (1): 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13010204.
Shuttleworth, L. A., S. Newman, and I. Korkos. 2023. “A Comparison of New and Existing Rootstocks to Reduce Canker of Apple Trees Caused by Neonectria Ditissima (Nectriaceae, Hypocreales).” CABI Agriculture and Bioscience 4 (1): 39.
Simon, A. M. O., K. A. Festus, S. Gudeta, and C. A. Oluyede. 2010. “Rootstock Growth and Development for Increased Graft Success of Mango (Mangifera Indica) in the Nursery.” African Journal of Biotechnology 9 (9): 1317–24.
Thies, J. A., and D. R. Panthee. 2023. “Editorial: Identification, Development and Use of Rootstocks to Improve Pest and Disease Resistance of Vegetable Crops.” Frontiers in Plant Science 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1320828.
Thompson, A. J., M. B. Pico, H. Yetişir, R. Cohen, and P. J. Bebeli. 2017. “Rootstock Breeding: Current Practices and Future Technologies.” In CABI eBooks, 70–93. CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780648972.007.
Tietel, Z., S. Srivastava, A. Fait, N. Tel-Zur, N. Carmi, and E. Raveh. 2020. “Impact of Scion/Rootstock Reciprocal Effects on Metabolomics of Fruit Juice and Phloem Sap in Grafted Citrus Reticulata.” PLOS ONE 15 (1): e0227192. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227192.
Tipu, M. M. H., M. M. Masud, R. Jahan, A. Baroi, and A. Hoque. 2021. “Identification of Citrus Greening Based on Visual Symptoms: A Grower’s Diagnostic Toolkit.” Heliyon 7 (11): e08387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08387.
Tworkoski, T., and G. Fazio. 2015. “Hormone and Growth Interactions of Scions and Size-Controlling Rootstocks of Young Apple Trees.” Plant Growth Regulation 78: 105–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0078-2.
Vahdati, K., S. Sarikhani, M. M. Arab, C. A. Leslie, A. M. Dandekar, N. Aletà, B. Bielsa, et al. 2021. “Advances in Rootstock Breeding of Nut Trees: Objectives and Strategies.” Plants 10: 2234. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112234.
Valverdi, N. A., and L. Kalcsits. 2021. “Rootstock Affects Scion Nutrition and Fruit Quality During Establishment and Early Production of ‘Honeycrisp’ Apple.” HortScience 56: 261–69. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci15488-20.
Verma, P., N. C. Sharma, D. P. Sharma, P. Kumar, K. Chand, and H. Thakur. 2024. “Dwarfism Mechanism in Malus Clonal Rootstocks.” Planta 260 (6): 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-024-04561-5.
Villalobos-Soublett, E., N. Verdugo-Vásquez, I. Díaz, and A. Zurita-Silva. 2022. “Adapting Grapevine Productivity and Fitness to Water Deficit by Means of Naturalized Rootstocks.” Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 870438. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.870438.
Vittal, H., N. Sharma, A. K. Dubey, M. Shivran, S. K. Singh, M. C. Meena, N. Kumar, et al. 2023. “Rootstock-Mediated Carbohydrate Metabolism, Nutrient Contents, and Physiological Modifications in Regular and Alternate Mango (Mangifera Indica l.) Scion Varieties.” PLOS ONE 18: e0284910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284910.
Vives-Peris, V., R. M. Pérez-Clemente, A. Gómez-Cadenas, and M. F. López-Climent. 2024. “Involvement of Citrus Shoots in Response and Tolerance to Abiotic Stress.” Horticulture Advances 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44281-023-00027-y.
Wang, D., and Y. Gao. 2025. “Advances in Fruit Tree Physiology and Molecular Biology.” Horticulturae 11 (12): 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11121455.
Xu, H., and D. Ediger. 2021. “Rootstocks with Different Vigor Influenced Scion–Water Relations and Stress Responses in AmbrosiaTM Apple Trees (Malus Domestica Var. Ambrosia).” Plants 10 (4): 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040614.
Xu, J., N. Zhang, K. Wang, Q. Xian, J. Dong, and X. Chen. 2022. “Exploring New Strategies in Diseases Resistance of Horticultural Crops.” Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1021350.
Yavari, A., F. Habibi, L. Naseri, M. Rasouli-Sadaghiani, A. Sarkhosh, and M. Pessarakli. 2022. “Responses of Semi-Vigorous Apple Rootstocks (MM106 and MM111) to Different Nitrate and Ammonium Ratios Under Soilless Culture.” Journal of Plant Nutrition 46 (3): 439–52.
Zhou, Z., L. Zhang, J. Shu, M. Wang, H. Li, H. Shu, X. Wang, Q. Sun, and S. Zhang. 2022. “Root Breeding in the Post-Genomics Era: From Concept to Practice in Apple.” Plants 11: 1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111408.
Zrig, A., S. Belhadj, T. Tounekti, H. Khemira, and S. Y. S. Elsheikh. 2023. “Perspective Chapter: Rootstock-Scion Interaction Effect on Improving Salt Tolerance in Fruit Trees.” In Plant Abiotic Stress Responses and Tolerance Mechanisms, edited by S. Hussain, T. H. Awan, E. A. Waraich, and M. I. Awan. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.108817.
Publication & Reviewer Details

Publication Information

  • Submitted: 11 March 2026
  • Accepted: 06 April 2026
  • Published (Online): 08 April 2026

Reviewer Information

  • Reviewer 1:
    Dr. Jegan K P
    Assistant Professor
    Adhiparasakthi Horticultural College

  • Reviewer 2:
    Anonymous

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of the publisher and/or the editor(s).
The publisher and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© Copyright (2026): Author(s). The licensee is the journal publisher. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits non-commercial use, sharing, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.